LHVC

 

2

The 2006 Edition Of Niwot Nostalgia Day

Journeys – Yesterday…Today…Tomorrow

 

 
3

By Betty Parham

BettyP@lhvc.com

 

For 30 years, Niwot citizens have gathered to celebrate their town and their lives at Nostalgia Day. What started out as a small, school sponsored event is now seeing a third generation participate in an annual gathering which has become an integral part of the Niwot community.

“Nobody thought it would last that long,” said Pat Murphy, one of the original organizers. “There were a couple of years that we thought it was going to fade away, but there were always people who wanted to keep it going.”

Now sponsored by the Niwot Community Association, aNostalgia Day has evolved considerably from the earlier days when it featured picnics and sack races, to an event that reflects the growth and diversity of the community.

Even though there have been many changes, memories of long ago Nostalgia Days are still fondly recalled. Pat Murphy remembered the year of the pig roast where participants feasted on a donated pig.

“Nobody knew so many people would show up. We really weren’t prepared and ended up running back and forth to the store for more supplies,” she said. The year of the pig was probably a preview of the growing popularity of the event, which now attracts well over 1000 people as opposed to a few hundred when it first began. 

Murphy’s daughter, Tara, is now 29, but remembers helping clean up when she was only four. She recalled the fun of playing mud volleyball and the time there was pizza dough wrestling. “We had this wrestling ring filled with pizza dough that was donated by Dominoes,” she said.

“The kids loved it, but every parent hated it. The dough was soft and gooey and we had to throw away shoes and clothes and it took weeks to get out of your hair,” she said.

While there might not be pizza dough or mud to roll around in, this year promises to be equally enjoyable.

The theme this year is Journeys – Yesterday…Today… Tomorrow, which will put an emphasis on children and their journey into the future.

A few of the things to look forward to include a pancake breakfast, a parade, scores of vendors and food booths, a quilt show and mini flea market, children’s games and rides, magic shows, a concert by Niwot Timberline Symphony Orchestra, a bake sale, a recipe contest, games and rides, music and varied entertainment.

A very special part of the day will be a storytelling session with long time resident Donlyn Whissen telling the story of her family members who were original settlers of the area during the time of Chief Niwot.

Remember to check out the Courier’s September issue for specific times and places for these events, and remember to keep Saturday, Sept. 9 free for a great time. For more information, or to participate, contact:

  • Nostalgia Day Organizer: Neal Anderson, 303-652-3099, nanderson82@comcast.net
  • Parade Coordinator: Carol and Matt Forbes, 303-652- 3588
  • Booth Coordinator: Gaythia Weis, 303-652-1347; Kylie Gertge-Booth: 303-702-1094
  • Fund Raising: Hossein Tolooee, 720-273-4113
  • Evening Events Coordinator: Neal Anderson, 303-652-3099
  • Table Set-Up/Tear Down: TBD
  • Traffic Control: Tony Santelli, 303-652-3888
  • Advertising: Terry Larsen, 303-652-1378; Bonnie Nelson, 303-845-3101
  • Children’s Games: NHS Orchestra Students as a fundraiser.
  • Quilt Showcase: Emily DeCillis, 303-652-1179
  • Event Application/ Insurance/Treasurer: Gary Zarlengo, 303-652-6290.

 

 

 

Photos courtesy of Pat Murphy and Curtis Jones

 

Nostalgia Day - then and now. Clockwise from top left, street dance and dinner in front of Rev. Taylor’s Restaurant; youngsters dressed for the parade; a balloon hat model; mud volleyball.

 

 

Return to LHVC

 

 

 

 

 

  LHVC

 

Left Hand Laurel Dwight Wederquist

 

By J. Svendsen-Delaney  

JSD@lhvc.com

 

Dwight Wederquist, this month’s Left Hand Laurel, is held in high regard by former students and by employees and fellow board members at Left Hand Valley Water District (LHVWD). Laurel

“He’s a great leader and a visionary,” said fellow LHVWD board member Craig Anderson. “He could see down the road a piece and tell you what was coming.”

Following a 10-year stint on the Niwot Sanitation board, Wederquist served on the LHVWD board for 15 years. “Term limits shoved me out,” Wederquist said with a hint of regret.

He said that he felt a sense of accomplishment serving on the board; it was gratifying to help build a reliable and fiscally responsible organization. “Not to mention that it was wonderful working with a neat bunch of people.”

Wederquist credits the LHVWD for making wise decisions as it anticipated the area’s growth. “The community has developed because water is available.” During Wederquist’s term, he convinced the organization to move into a new building, arguing that the office would be more efficient next to one of its plants.

“Dwight was a watchdog where the budget was concerned,” Anderson said. “He was thorough in all regards – that’s probably why he’s so successful in his other ventures.”

When IBM arrived in 1965, employees expressed a desire to feel more integral to the community. In a joint effort between Niwot citizens and IBM, Wederquist and friends founded the Niwot Men’s Club. The club was the driving force behind the Niwot Volunteer Fire Department and it initiated the first Niwot recreation program that offered activities for children.

Wederquist’s wife, Jean, said, “The Men’s Club tried to offer something that would appeal to every interested child.” Those activities set the precedent for the current Niwot baseball program.

Wederquist holds a masters degree in education administration from CU and an undergraduate degree in education from CSU, where he met Jean. The couple will celebrate 56 years of marriage this year. They have three grown children: Kurt, Scott, and Heidi.

After teaching four years in Boulder at an elementary school, Wederquist worked as a school principal for 20 years. When he began his work in administration in the early 60’s, Hygiene, Lincoln and Longmont Estates districts were combined, and he was instrumental in initiating construction on Hygiene elementary school.

Later, he worked as assistant principal at Heritage Middle School, principal at Erie elementary and, finally, principal of alternative education in St. Vrain Valley School District where he oversaw the Drop Out Recovery and Teen Parenting programs, adult education, ESL and the alternative high school.

Wederquist said of the alternative high school, “I never knew what would happen next,” adding how impressed he was with the young adults. “That’s where I learned the most about empowerment.”

After his career in public education, Wederquist taught classes in conflict management, emphasizing the premise that when people lose power, they lose respect and when they feel powerless, they lash out. He started his own company offering private conflict management and personnel mediation. Clients included school districts, fire departments and Aurora social services.

“He made good use of his considerable mediation skills while he served on the board,” said Kathy Peterson, LHVWD general manager. “And, he was a great mentor. He made you stand up for your ideas and express them clearly.”

Although Craig Anderson thinks highly of the new LHVWD board president who replaced Wederquist, he said, “Those are some big shoes to fill!” 

 

Photo by J. Svendsen-Delany

 

The Wederquists, Dwight and Jean, at their home on 79th Street .

   

 

 

Return to LHVC

 

 

 

 

 

 

  LHVC

 

FasTracks Now Riding Split Rail

 

By Shari Phiel

ShariP@lhvc.com        

 

            While the debate over diesel or electric rail cars continues, FasTracks officials announced at a series of meetings held July 11 through 13, they are now splitting the U.S. 36 Corridor Project into two separate studies. 

            Initially, the project combined the Denver-Boulder-Longmont commuter rail study with a study for intended highway improvement running along the U.S. 36 corridor from Denver to Boulder , ending just south of Table Mesa Drive .

            The commuter rail study will now be called the Northwest Rail Alignment due to its proximity to the Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks.  FasTracks officials are working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to determine whether an Environmental Assessment (EA) or an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) is required. 

            Three reasons were given for the separation.  First, the structure of the FasTracks vote in 2004 allotted or allocated funds for the rail project.  Jonathan Bartsch of CDR Associates said, “That’s a committed project and will not require federal funding.”  The highway developments will be eligible for federal funding.

            Second, it will let officials review and measure the impact of each study separately.  FasTracks representatives expect to be able to provide clearer information to stakeholders for a better understanding of the study and the project.

            Finally, each project will be able to move forward with separate funding.  “That’s important because, in this case, the highway improvements are not tied to the rail projects, and the rail projects are not tied to

the highway improvements.” Bartsch said.

            The Northwest Rail Alignment project would run along existing Burlington Northern Santa Fe rail lines, call for the development of one additional track and have eight transit stations between Denver and Boulder .  The number of transit stations between Boulder and Longmont is still under consideration.                  

            Along with separating the two studies, representatives for CDR Associates confirmed that the property located at 6285 Lookout Road is no longer under consideration as a transit station.  According to CDR Associates, the property owners have indicated that sensitive 911 equipment left behind by Intrado, which last occupied the building, made the property unusable for FasTracks purposes. 

            Bruce Dierking is the

attorney for the property owners and clarified that while there is no remaining 911 or Intrado owned equipment remaining in the building, the building does house, “substantial communications infrastructure” including fiber optic lines that can provide sizable telecommunications capacity.    

            Dierking also noted, “The building was recently selected as a finalist by a well-known international tech company looking to locate a facility somewhere between Colorado Springs and Ft. Collins . The owner continues to market the property actively, and now that the high tech / telecom market seems to be rebounding, we fully expect the building to attract a major employer in the near future.” 

            Representatives for the project are now working with property management firms to locate an acceptable alternative.  One possible property has been identified, a mini-storage facility in the same area, and is under consideration. 

            Additionally, the group has ruled out a Niwot station location, which would have been located near Niwot Road and Hwy. 119, but is still reviewing the impact and cost of having a station at the Sugar Mill site in east Longmont . 

            Still under consideration is a layover station to house engines and cars during off peak hours on the property located across from IBM, on the southeast corner of Hwys. 52 and 119.

            For addition information about FasTracks contact Meghana Shaw of CDR Associates 303-442-7367, mshah@mediate.org. Or visit the FasTracks website at www.rtd-denver.com.

 

 

 

 

Return to LHVC

 

 

 

  LHVC

 

Niwot Loop And Cottontail Trail Connection Is Official

 

By Mandy Sutyak

MandyS@lhvc.com

 

In a brief ceremony hosted by Boulder County Parks and Open Space and attended by about 70 people, the connection between the Niwot Loop and Cottontail Trail was declared officially open. Niwot Loop

During the ceremony, Mike Patton, director of Open Space for the City of Boulder , said this is just one example of the partnership the city has enjoyed with Boulder County and he hoped the longstanding relationship would continue for many years. Patton also said that he believes these types of projects help reinforce the commitment to and appreciation of open space.

Boulder County Commissioner Will Toor, who rode his bike to the ceremony, said the connection demonstrated the excellent level of support the county receives from residents and local government. He also said that the current increases in oil prices and demands for  energy conservation will see trails and mass transit playing a greater part in our lives. With the Niwot Trails Master Plan, a complete connection between Boulder and Longmont is now being planned.

Gunbarrel resident Gail Fay cycled to the event. She said, “I couldn’t be more delighted. I thank everyone who put time and effort into this. We’ve waited almost three decades. This has been a dream. Now we have no excuse not to come to Niwot.”

Attendees were invited to Niwot after the ceremony where Flowers in Bloom and Altamann Cycles provided snacks and refreshments while La Cavasita hosted a wine tasting.   

 

 

Photo By Mandy Sutyak

 

The connection between the Niwot Loop and the Cottontail Trail is declared officially open. Pictured left to right are Tim Swope from Boulder County Transportation, Niwot Community Association President Neal Anderson, Boulder County Commissioners Ben Pearlman and Will Toor, Boulder County Transportation Department Director Larry Matel, and Niwot Business Association President Biff Warren.

 

 

 

Return to LHVC

 

 

 

  LHVC

 

Pheasant Ridge Ranch Runs Out Of Options

 

By Betty Parham and Bruce Warren

BettyP@lhvc.com

                                                    

The earthy smell of horses still lingers at the Pheasant Ridge Ranch, even though their owners, by order of Boulder County , have removed the 62 horses that were boarded there. The county said the long time equestrian facility was in violation of the county’s land use code.

But another pungent scent also lingers over Colleen Seltz’s 71 acres located at 8750 Lookout Road in Gunbarrel – that of citizen ire.

Through letters to the editor of local newspapers, e-mails and phone calls, citizens have directed their displeasure primarily at the county’s zoning bureaucracy, which they say created massive inconvenience for the horse owners, was insensitive to small business and community needs and did damage to an already diminishing Boulder County horse culture in general.

Also coming under fire was the county’s methods, which began with a single complaint by e-mail about the facility authored by someone whom no one can seem to identify.

The property is zoned for agricultural use, which contrary to most news reports, actually allows an equestrian center, defined as a facility where “15 or more different people per month, other than the owner or manager of the property, are, for a fee, trained or instructed in riding, driving, or showing horses,” as a use by right.

The code also states, “This use requires a building lot. Activities related to the use may occur on agricultural outlots which do not prohibit the activity, however no structures related to the use are allowed on the outlot. Boarding of horses is permitted.”

Therein lies the problem with the Seltz property, which is actually a 7-acre outlot, carved out and made subject to a conservation easement when the prior owners wanted to cluster development of 10 lots on an original parcel of more than 170 acres.  That conservation easement, a document recorded in the real estate records, protects the property from further development, and by its terms, the outlot is not a building lot.

The regulations, developed several years ago with input from the Boulder County Horse Association, specifically define an “ Equestrian Center ” as a separate use allowed on agricultural property, but one which comes with limits.  “Open Agricultural Uses,” which are permitted on the outlot, limit such activity to boarding by fewer than 15 different individual people in a month.  

But according to current owner Colleen Seltz, the facility had approximately 39 boarders in residence when she purchased it as a business in 2004. No violations were ever cited against the former owners.

Conspiracy theories are also beginning to percolate about the identity and the motives of the person behind the complaint, and who might want to get their hands on the property if and when the business goes under. Seltz reportedly filed for bankruptcy protection.

The Boulder Weekly, an alternative paper in Boulder , headlined the story “Land Muggings” aimed at “small, rural, family-owned business” that will “further erode our community’s heritage, urbanize the culture, and empower bureaucrats and losers.”

Apparently reacting to public pressure, Graham Billingsley, who heads the Boulder County Land Use Department, used the opinion page of the Longmont Daily Times-Call to explain the county’s action.

Of the single e-mail that set off the inspection that essentially shut down the facility, Billingsley explained that Boulder County has a policy of enforcement on a complaint basis only and that the zoning enforcement mechanism can be and often is activated by a single complaint.

“When a complaint of illegal activity is brought to our attention, we have the responsibility to respond to and correct that violation. However, we do not go around looking for violations or seeking to shut down local businesses; the idea of policing the county for land-use violations is not one supported by the Boulder County Commissioners,” Billingsley wrote.

Once the county inspected the property, several land-use code violations emerged which included sheds built on conservation easement property, mobile homes without permits and other violations. On being informed of the violations, Seltz helped two families move off the property, got rid of the mobile homes and in general, tried to comply.

But because the property was subject to the conservation easement, which does not allow an equestrian center, Seltz had no other choice but to inform the owners to move the horses or face legal action from the county.

“You would think considering all the inconvenience and the possible loss of my business that I could at least get a hearing or some kind of appeal to ask for an exception. After all, this is supposed to be America ,” Seltz said, “but I was told that was not possible.”

Indeed, Boulder County is simply following the law when it refused to give Seltz an avenue to appeal. “There is no avenue for a hearing in the cases involving requests for an individual variance,” said Pat Mayne, a county attorney. “It is Colorado state law. Not all states have that law, but Colorado does and Boulder County is just following the state law.”

The only way Seltz could get a pubic hearing would be to disobey the land use department notice of violation and force the county to take her to court. She chose instead to inform her borders who went about the task of finding other facilities and removing their horses.

There was a hearing of sorts on July 19, when Graham Billingsley agreed to meet with Seltz, the horse owners and other supporters at the ranch.

About 70 people showed up to fire questions at Billingsley about the situation. What was apparent was that most of them could not understand why such a popular facility couldn’t stay open in spite of complicated land use laws and a single anonymous complaint.

“My responsibility is to enforce the law. I can’t change the law. Only county commissioners can change the law.” Billingsley said.

Perhaps Suzanne Webel, president of the Boulder County Horse Association, best sums up the episode. “Everybody is a little bit right and everybody is a little bit wrong in the whole sad story,” she said. “Buyers need to read the fine print, especially regarding zoning and land use regulations whenever they consider purchasing property in Boulder County and the county should be willing to consider individual circumstances when they are confronted with such a problem.

“Horses and horse people are responsible for preserving a lot of agriculture and open space in Boulder County , but in the last 20 years the horse population in Boulder County has fallen in half. We need the county’s help to maintain a viable horse community. There should be a way for the county and the owners to come to an equitable solution.”

Simple enough, but the only possibility that remains to keep the facility open would be for Boulder County Commissioners to change the land use code regulations concerning equestrian centers to allow such activity on land which is not designated as a building lot. 

            There was a hearing of sorts on July 19, when Graham Billingsley agreed to meet with Seltz, the horse owners and other supporters at the ranch. About 70 people showed up to fire questions at Billingsley. Many offered creative loopholes in the code that might allow the facility to remain open. Among the ideas presented was the possibility of forming a co-op, but it wasn’t clear if that would solve the problem. Seltz said she would look into the idea, but was not hopeful.  

            What was apparent was that most could not understand why such a popular facility couldn’t stay open in spite of complicated land use laws and a single anonymous complaint. “My responsibility is to enforce the law. I can’t change the law. Only county commissioners can change the law.” Billingsley said.

            In a late development, Boulder County Commissioners again heard from Seltz, who has filed for bankruptcy, and others about the personal and economic impact of the ranch’s closing.   The Commissioners acknowledged that the Pheasant Ridge situation was a unique one and noted that few complaints have been made regarding the zoning laws which prevent the ranch from being run as a business.

            Michelle Krezek, projects manager for the land use department, proposed discussing possible changes to the land use code, which is currently being restructured.

 

 

Return to LHVC

 

 

 

  LHVC           

 

Computer Corner

Vista Is On The Horizon

 

By Donna Currie

Donna@computertoyz.com

 

            If the title is a little confusing, I guess I should explain that “Vista” is the name of Microsoft’s newest operating system (OS), due for release…soon(er)…or later.

            The problem with any new operating system is that there are always bugs that need to be worked out, not only with the OS itself, but with the things that you use with it.

            Most people have peripherals that they’d like to keep using, like cameras or printers, and for those things to run with the new OS, manufacturers need to write “drivers.”

            Drivers, simply explained, are bits of software that tell the computer how to use the hardware. For your old printer to work with a new OS, it needs new software so the computer knows the printer is indeed a printer and not just a hunk of junk on the end of a cable.

            Programs might also need some updates to work with Vista . Many things will work just fine, but some won’t, and some companies can be slow about updating their older products. After all, they want you to buy new stuff.

            So, the more cautious consumers might want to wait just a little while before they leap into Vista .

            Others of us, however, have installed beta (test) versions of Vista , and we’re enjoying the view. The saner of us have installed it on test machines, though, because anything beta is risky. And there’s no technical support for beta products.

            To test Vista , I cobbled together a computer from bits and pieces I had laying around. It wouldn’t install. I replaced some parts, tried again. It installed, but didn’t run. More boxes, more parts…Eventually I had something that installed and ran, but some features didn’t work.

            What’s the use of testing something if all the features aren’t enabled? More boxes, a few new parts, and I had a fully functional computer that crashed with amazing regularity.

            More parts. By this time, I had two computers assembled and Vista installed on both. The first runs well, but without the eye candy that will probably help sell Vista . The second is finally fully functional and stable.

            The final release of Vista is likely to be a lot less problematic, but upgrading isn’t going to be a picnic. This OS needs a powerful computer. If you bought a computer with anything earlier than Windows XP installed, don’t even think about upgrading to Vista .

            If you bought a computer with XP installed, if it’s not currently a top-of-the-line system, plan on upgrading at least some hardware for Vista . And if you want all of the bells and whistles, plan on upgrading even more.

            So, is it worth it? There are three major differences that I’ve noticed, right off the bat. First, it’s pretty. XP looked gaudy and cartoonish to me. Vista is  more elegant.

            Second, installing new hardware has changed. In a way, it’s smarter, but it also gives the user a little less control…which might not be the worst thing. I’ve seen a few computers messed up when people have forcefully installed incorrect drivers.

            Third, the system is more security-aware. If you start to change certain things, the screen dims and a box pops up asking if this is really you trying to make these changes.

            The constant pop-ups were a little maddening, but once it was configured, the questioning stopped. I guess this feature is intended to keep people from meddling where they could damage the software, and also to warn the user if a virus is trying to change things on its own.

            But really, it’s a little like having your stove warn you that you could burn yourself. And do you really want to turn that burner on?

            People who seldom mess with system settings won’t be bothered by this feature very often, so perhaps it’s a good thing. We’ll see. And I’m told that “under the hood” Vista has even more security features that aren’t apparent to end users, making it more difficult for viruses and spyware to invade.

That’s definitely a good thing.

            The last big difference is the same as with every OS upgrade Microsoft has done. Some familiar things have moved from one place to another, changed, or disappeared. New things have been added. Yawn.

            As far as whether I’ll like Vista or not, that remains to be seen. And part of that depends on how painful it will be to work on, once Vista computers start coming in to the shop.

            Don’t worry, there’s plenty of time for me to prepare. I’ll be ready when you break your shiny new Vista computer.

            Donna Currie owns B.C. Computer, a repair service and more. For repairs, just drop your computer off at Longmont Printing, 628 S. Sunset. Longmont .

            For more information call 303-651-7433 or email donna@computertoyz.com. Got a technical question? Just send an email. No charge, no obligation.